قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / Entertainment / V for Vendetta knew that our future would be bleak

V for Vendetta knew that our future would be bleak



The ridge is a place where you can see the future. So are movies. In yesterday’s future, we watch a movie about the future and look at the things he tells us today, tomorrow, and yesterday.

Film: B means Vendetta (2006) directed by James McTaig

Future: IN B means Vendetta, a lot has not gone so fast, and it does not seem that much needs to be done about it. The film is set in 2020, and London is now ruled by the authoritarian fascist Supreme Chancellor Satler (John Hurt), leader of the extremely Nazi party Norsefier.

Parallels with the real 2020 are alarming: “St. The Mary Virus unleashed a worldwide pandemic, crippled the United States (which is not really a factor in the film̵

7;s London-oriented plot) and sent it down the path of economic destruction and civil war. The Norsefire party, which has been riding a wave of neoconservative support, is shutting out gay citizens, anyone who professes a religion except the state-sanctioned church, and backed by the state media. The observation is almost coincidental: government vans regularly sweep the streets to listen to citizens.

This is the world in which we meet Evie Hammond (Natalie Portman), an unnecessary employee of the British television network. One night she is threatened with sexual violence by the secret police, and later she is rescued by V (Hugo Tking), an inhuman terrorist in the guise of Guy Fawkes. Like Guy Fawkes, V has a plan to blow up Parliament and kill several members of the government responsible for the takeover of Norsefire and, as it turned out, its own creation. The film ends before we know if it worked, but not before the people of London are inspired to put on a mask and go outside.

Past: B means Vendetta, although not as significant as the comedian Alan Moore and David Lloyd, on which it is based, is a film that is non-apologetically about a terrorist. In March 2006, it became radical for a blockbuster film that Wachowski wrote as their first major project Matrix trilogy. Reviewers were delighted with this.

“The smartest aspect of the film is how it turns a terrorist into a crusader while remaining politically correct.” Guardian in his review wrote the film critic Philip French. “What he fails to do is create a secure future or avoid pomp.”

“By all means, this should be the worst time that can be missed B means VendettaThe film is – in fact, there is no polite word for it – a hero of terrorism, prone to say things like “Violence can be used for good” and “Sometimes blowing up a building can change the world.” The AV club. “It simply came to our notice then B means Vendetta to play like such a pleated crowd?

In just five years since September 11, and the same number of years spent in the war on terror in the United States, the blockbuster film about the terrorist felt radical in such a way that he was arrested almost immediately. The film softens this very obvious edge by openly hinting at it 1984, making him feel as much respect for George Orwell as Lloyd and Moore.

Alan Moore, the comic book writer on whom the film is based, declined to appear his name in the film or any material promoting it. (Moore made it clear that he objected to this any adaptation of his work is not fundamental, regardless of quality.) Purists objected to the film reducing the very specific response of the source material to Thatcher England to the metaphor of Bush-era America (in a plot where America is specifically postponed) or the way the film turned V into a more daring hero than on the dead wool extremist. But time has made it possible to make all these points effectively controversial. Now the film is much different.

Present: After all, both the great strength and weakness of Russia B means Vendetta is its lack of specificity. Orwellian aesthetics gives him a kind of timeless veneer, and his arguments about fascism and the creeping death of freedom are old, which become painfully relevant every time there is a new attempt to undermine democracy by the authorities.

The longest-running symbol of the film is a mask that was adopted in real-world protest by the hacking group Anonymous in the early 2010s, when Occupy Wall Street was the most famous activist movement in the United States. Unfortunately, Guy Fawkes’s smiling mask was intended to denote anonymous solidarity, which is permeated by something vital in institutional oppression: it is not applied in the same way.

In 2020, attacks on democracy are brazen and blunt, and we know painfully that subtlety is not a sign of authoritarianism. In fact, as critic Scott Meslow wrote in 2018, so far B means Vendetta has more bites than after release, now we can say that he does not go far enough.

“It is a universe in which one fatal death of an innocent little girl could inspire the whole society to oppose the military police,” Meslow wrote. “He resists the anti-democratic political movement, which is partly rising from the powerful but principled members of this political movement. Modern adaptation can reject all points of the plot as too optimistic.

B means Vendetta He doesn’t care much about details – creeping concessions to the Nazis are listed in a gloomy cascade, and resistance is caused by one dramatic act. The universe of the film is small; The only prospect outside of Evie is Finch (Stephen Rea), a Scotland Yard inspector who stands on Route V and discovers that the government has developed a crisis that has led to its seizure of power. Through Finch, we do it all together, and at the film’s best touch, it’s all depicted in one dramatic montage: the corruption, domination, and revolution that coexist, as the events depicting the film are interrupted by scenes about to take place over the Finale. movie 30 minutes.

It is very influential, but it closes on how much work is to defend democracy – how much the people who need to stand next to you in protest actually prefer the law of fascism, while the fascists are equated with them, as institutions are built not for democracy but for normalityand how the people who govern them will always choose the latter over the former.


Source link