The UK's Digital Technology, Culture, Media and Sports Committee said in its report published on Monday that many of the internal emails of Facebook demonstrated that the social media platform "deliberately and knowingly" violated the privacy laws of the data and competition [19659002CarddocumentsreviewedbythecommitteeofsomecompaniesincludethecorrespondencebetweentheCUPsandtheheadsofcompaniesofthecompanywhicharesuppliedtotheCossacksagainsttheprotest  . The committee received documents at the end of last year from a small company called Six4Three, which is behind the complaint.
According to the committee, the documents show that Facebook "is ready to redefine the privacy settings of its users for data transmission" to program developers. Legislators also argue that documents show that the social network was able to "starve" some data developers and get them out of business.
"Companies, such as Facebook, should not be allowed to behave as" digital gangsters "in the online world, considering themselves ahead of and beyond the law," the report says.
In response to the report, Facebook stated that it had not violated data protection laws or competition laws. Karim Palant, Facebook Country Policy Manager in the UK, said in a statement that the company "maintains effective privacy legislation", and is open to "content management".
Facebook announced in December that the Six4Three lawsuits were "selectively" leaked "to tell" only one side of the story. "CNN and other information departments appealed to the California state court to disclose documents
The prosecution is the last headache for a giant of social media that is being watched by politicians in the United States and around the world after a series of data scandals, including Cambridge Analytica.
Despite the fact that Facebook was main center the report, the Committee on Digital Technology, Culture, the Media and Sport made several recommendations to combat false news and misinformation.
- The social media platforms should be subject to the mandatory code of ethics
- Independent regulator of Great Britain should control technology companies and be able to initiate lawsuits against them.
- Antitrust regulators should conduct a "comprehensive audit" of the advertising market in social networks.
- UK regulators should investigate whether Facebook has participated in anticompetitive practices.
- The government should study recent elections to prove manipulation of voters.
The committee's investigation lasted 1
8 months. nearly two dozen sessions of verbal evidence, including a special hearing in Washington and the "International Grand Committee" in which representatives from nine countries attended. The final report was more than 100 pages long.
"Large technology companies should not be allowed to expand in geometric progression, without restrictions or due regulatory oversight," the report says. "Only governments and the law are powerful enough to hold them back."
The report strongly criticized Facebook and Zuckerberg, who repeatedly refused to appear before the committee last year, despite numerous requests. .
"The Facebook management structure is non-transparent for non-business people, and it seemed to be designed to hide knowledge and responsibility for specific solutions," the report says. "Facebook used the strategy of sending witnesses that they thought were the most appropriate representatives but was not properly informed about the most important issues and could not or did not decide to fail to answer many of our questions."
The authors of the report said that "there is no doubt that this strategy was intentional."
Damian Collins, chairman of the committee , declaring in a statement that Zuckerberg "does not always show the levels of leadership and personal responsibility that one should expect from someone sitting at the top of one of the worlds
British authorities last year decided that Facebook violated the laws of the United Kingdom without resorting to to shield in the data users, and not reporting tens of millions of people like Cambridge Analytics collects their information for use in political campaigns.
Palant, public policy manager at Facebook, said that the company shares the "concern of the committee about false news and election honesty" and that it has made "a significant contribution to their investigation," responding to more than 700 questions.
Palant also emphasized the "significant changes" in the political advertising standards that the company made.
"No other channel for political advertising is so transparent and offers the tools we do," Palant said. "We have increased the number of commands that work to detect and protect users from poor content to 30,000 people, and have invested heavily in machine learning, artificial intelligence and computer technology to prevent this type of abuse."