WASHINGTON – President Trump showed that the United States can not increase tariffs on Chinese goods on March 1, as planned, despite claims by a senior sales representative that the US should adhere to a firm deadline.
The term for completing the talks with Beijing is not a charming date, he told reporters on Tuesday, as the average American and Chinese negotiators began a meeting this week. Officials at the government level will join the discussions on Thursday
Trump and his advisers said they plan to meet with President Ci in the coming weeks. According to this scenario, the Trump CI meeting will actually be the deadline for an agreement. American officials want this session to take place in the United States
Since mid-January, both sides met either in Washington or in Beijing to conclude an agreement to end the annual trade dispute that has swept global markets and surpassed corporate investment plans. . Mr Trump has issued a number of controversial statements regarding the deadline for negotiations, his plans to meet with Mr X and whether he will increase tariffs at some point.
"The real question: will we raise tariffs? ̵
He said: "I can not tell you exactly about time, but the date is not a charming date. Much can happen. "
Sometimes Mr. Trump's remarks made him contradictory to his leading china, sales representative Robert Lighthouse. Lacking an agreement, he repeatedly set a firm deadline for tariffs of 200 billion dollars in Chinese goods to 25% from 10%.
"Deadline – March 1. adding that he is not thinking about the continuation. A month earlier, he described him as a "rigid term."
The Office of the US Trade Representative did not immediately respond to a comment request.
The White House cited the comments made by Trump last week.
For Chinese, conflicting statements are anxiety, said Eswar Prasad, a scientist from Cornell University in China. "They are not sure which approach to take more seriously – Lighthizer or Trump," he said. Although China welcomes the continuation of the trade rebellion for another month or two, he said that they are afraid that US requirements will increase during this period. "If this term is extended, they can be asked for much more in exchange for a bit of time," Mr Prasad said.
So far, he said, Beijing seeks to make sufficient trade deals, including additional purchases. soybeans, natural gas and other commodities to keep the US from raising tariffs scheduled to begin at 12:01 on March 2, said the negotiating people
Lighthizer staff describe it as a disappointment in changing the direction from the White House .
At the end of January, Chinese negotiators invited Mr. Trump to visit Mr. Xi on the tropical island of Hainan and develop an agreement. Meeting at the Oval Office with China's largest official, Liu Heng, on January 31, the president said he could meet with the Chinese leader twice. Mr Trump's supporters, however, persuaded him, at least at that moment that it was too early to meet, and that a trip to China for a deal would put a lot of pressure on him to accept the conditions of China.
Lighthizer and other assistants also insisted on a firm final term to increase leverage on Beijing – an issue on which Mr Trump made controversial statements during two meetings on January 31.
After the presidents of the two countries met in Buenos Aires on December 1. when they decided to extend the deadline for raising the tariff until March 1, from January 1, there was a dispute over the date when Trump's assistants departed for the Air Force flight, people were told about the talks
The White House statement did not include a solid language on the deadline. After the objections of the militant trade adviser Peter Navarro, said by the people, the statement was unequivocally rewritten that if by March 1 "the parties will not be able to reach an agreement, tariffs of 10% will be raised to 25%."
Write Bob Davis at email@example.com and Alex Leary at firstname.lastname@example.org
Correction and Strengthening
said that if the term for concluding the trade agreement will be expanded, China may "ask for much more in exchange for a bit of time." An earlier version of this story misidentified this allegation with US Trade Representative Robert Lighthouse.