The story goes on below  "At all these sessions, Patten was honest and the Government stated in a lawsuit before sentencing a lobbyist on a Friday.
A note from federal prosecutors substantially impedes the description of what Patten helped them explaining to the US District Court judge Amy Berman Jackson stated that they would submit this material under the seal as it "includes sensitive information about other investigations and individuals who were not (and can not) be accused of a crime. "
19659009] Sign up today to receive Newsletter # 1 in Politics
Patten's previous work as a foreign political consultant, said the federal prosecutors, helped make him "a valuable resource for the government in a number of other criminal investigations, providing useful information about additional individuals, and
When explaining Patten's cooperation, prosecutors confirmed that he was is ready to testify last fall against his fellow Paul Manaforth before the head of the former campaign Trump acknowledged as guilty and avoided trial in the DC on charges of money laundering, not for having registered
Patten is threatened with maximum sentences of up to 25 years, a fine of up to $ 250,000 and a dismissal under supervision of up to three years, although his attorneys on Monday called Jackson instead of a 47-year-old an old lobby test in the light of his collaboration and acceptance of responsibility for his crimes.
"He asks the Court, by pronouncing its verdict, to admit that its crimes were not motivated by greed or the desire to hide relevant information from the American public or the dop ve or cover any potential interference in presidential elections, 2016 – Patten lawyers wrote in their city & # 39; yatniy note . "On the contrary, Mr Patten's decision in this case follows, first of all, from the desire to satisfy the requests of his clients and to present himself in the best light after he has suddenly discovered himself the subject of an investigation into Russian intervention." Public prosecutors Patten paid for the American "solos-free buyer" to buy tickets for their unnamed Ukrainian client from the first Trump Committee, not disclosing that they are funded by a foreign person.
At Patten's lawyers' remarks on Monday, they admitted that their clients had advised little to go, but argued that it had nothing to do with party politics, noting that he was not a trummup and voting for Hillary Clinton in the presidential election of 2016
were tickets to the post-election party, not attempts to influence the election or politicians, "they wrote. More importantly, he was blinded by the desire to adapt to his client. Although the foregoing explains why Mr Patten did what he did, he does not give a reason for his decision. It was a complete failure in the court decision, and Mr Patten regrets his involvement in inauguration tickets. " connected with foreign payment for the inauguration ticket, as well as violation of foreign lobbying.
Patten's lawyers explained in his remark that his client "was rightly mistaken" in considering the evidence required by the Senate committee, including removing about 200,000 emails from the Gmail account. Patten had previously given some documents to the Senate and was sitting at a voluntary meeting, so he "wrongly believed that he could freely delete his letters."
The sentence will be the last in a series of hearings related to Muller's investigation, which today included allegations against at least 34 people and three companies. So far, seven and a half years of Manaforth, associated with a series of financial levies and conspiracies, are set to be the longest, after which the three-year sentence that Michael Cohen, a former Trump lawyer, must begin service
Not enough last scoop? Subscribe to the POLITICO Playbook and get the latest news every morning – in the Inbox.