A year ago SpaceX launched its Falcon Heavy rocket for the first time. Millions set up as a space company, Elona Muska, took on the list of the world's most powerful missiles.
Orders arrived last year, and even before the second flight with them came the certification of the Air Force. The Falcon Heavy manifesto has grown to include contract missions, including three commercial missions. Although only one has a well-known price tag ̵
Heavy has enough contracts to cover the cost of its development, which amounted to over $ 500 million, Musk said last year, with all funding coming from spaceX Space.
Having said CNBC, some people in the industry are afraid of the concept of re-use, or launch, landing and launch again, which became the trademark for SpaceX. Last year, SpaceX became the first company to launch and land the same orbital rocket thrice. This is partly due to the increased power and reliability of the Falcon 9 rocket, which Musk said "capable of at least 100 flights."
And critic Falcon Heavy starts to sound familiar. "There is a repetitive pattern here," Anderson said. – These are the same tired, old arguments that we see for Falcon Heavy.
The lack of competitive missiles is also beneficial for Falcon Heavy. The only operational missile to be compared is the United Launch Alliance Delta IV Heavy, and it's retiring soon. NASA's (or SLS) and Blue Glenn spacecraft are new potential entrants in the heavy-duty vehicle market, but no missile is expected to begin until 2021. a robust evaluation of the European missile that revealed that Ariane 6 would not be a competitive or sustainable option.