قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ Business https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ Qualcomm asks regulators to ban the import of some iPhone models

Qualcomm asks regulators to ban the import of some iPhone models



Stand Qualcomm during CES 2019 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
Photo: Justin Sullivan (Getty Images)

Qualcomm chip maker locked in a bitter patent battle with Apple's technology giant who has not yet received

Qualcomm originally filed a case with the US International Trade Commission in 2017, arguing that several of Apple iOS's licenses had infringed its patents and that the latter had required $ 7 billion in royalties and license fees. According to Reuters, ITC's Thomas Pender administrative lawyer found that Apple had violated patents but refused to impose a ban on "some of the old iPhone models containing Intel Corp. chips," which would give Qualcomm an unfair advantage on the US mobile chip market. However, Qualcomm has won partial bans in Germany as well as China.

According to AppleInsider, specific disputes about energy conservation methods for wireless modems. Apple recently announced that it has fixed its software in order to make one of the patent disputes a controversial issue with AppleInsider, which reported it on iOS 12.1 (end of October 2018).

Any ban is unlikely to lead to serious long-term consequences for Apple, Reuters wrote how the company requests six months to demonstrate that the fix is ​​functional:

Any possible ban on iPhone imports in the United States may not be long, because Apple last week revealed that it had found a software fix to avoid a violation of one of the Qualcomm patents. Apple appealed to the regulators to give it a full six months to prove that the fixation works.

… Cases where ITC detects patent infringements, but does not prohibit the import of products, are rare. In December, ITC announced in its entirety that it will review Pender's decision and decide whether to defend it or cancel it by the end of March.

Qualcomm, for its part, claims that the Apple correction occurred, despite the fact that Apple insisted on trial. It is impossible to back it up, which may affect the previous Pender decision. In addition, the court requires Apple to refuse to request a six-month delay if the ban is imposed, according to AppleInsider.

On the contrary, Apple insists that the practice of licensing Qualcomm patent is illegal. in a separate, ongoing litigation against Qualcomm with the Federal Trade Commission, which has not yet been convicted. Both companies will go to trial in April, as well as in Apple's window for fix and, probably, after the FTC has closed.

[Reuters]


Source link