74-year-old Craig is a top Democrat who was charged with a case related to Muller's work, which has led to accusations against numerous Republicans affiliated with President Trust Donald Trump.
The case in which the United States Office of the Prosecutor of the District of Columbia, together with the Department of National Security of the Ministry of Justice, is likely to draw attention to the application of the Ministry of Justice to a one-time unclear law applicable to unregistered foreign agents, the law on the registration of foreign agents or FARA.
Craig was initially prosecuted for violating the FARA, although he was charged with other offenses after the expiry of the statute of limitations for FARA.
He must pay a proclamation to the federal court on Friday night.
Craig's lawyers, William Taylor and William Murphy called the conviction "unfair and deceptive."
"This charge accuses Mr. Craig of misleading the FARA unit of the Ministry of Justice to avoid registration. He himself is unfair and misleading, he ignores the opposing evidence," wrote lawyers. "Mr. Craig had no interest in misleading the FARA unit because he had not done anything that required his registration.
The charge against Craig, who was an adviser to the White House during the Obama administration, relates to the work he performed for Ukraine in 201
Client of Skadden , The Ministry of Justice of Ukraine, hired it to write a report on the trial of Yulia Tymoshenko, a former prime minister of Ukraine, a project on which Craig was the chief prosecutor.
According to the indictment, from the very beginning of the work on the report, Craig did not want to be registered as Agent for Ukraine "at least partly because he believed that this could prevent him or other persons in [Skadden] from
The indictment also stated that Craig had been suspended from registering because of his desire to hide that a third party, a private individual – paid more than 4 million to the firm nin dollars for the report and that the firm had "parallel cooperation with Ukraine to assist in pursuing Tymoshenko on additional charges".
At the end of 2012, Craig contacted several newspaper reporters at the time of the public disclosure of the report – the prosecutor's step, said in the charge, demanded his registration as an agent of Ukraine. But what happened further forced the prosecutors to prosecute, according to the indictment.
After the department of the Ministry of the Interior of the Republic of Paraguay asked the firm whether he should register as a result of his work, Craig supposedly kept information about his contacts with lawyers in his firm and "missed the essential facts about his actions in Assistance to Ukrainian Media "
In early 2013, when FARA staff members asked Craig about his work in Ukraine, he gave them a letter containing "false and false statements and omissions", including the fact that he provided only one "brief explanatory statement" to one of the journalists and that he had contacted other reporters after the public release of the document, indictment.
After the FARA unit came to the conclusion that the company needed registration as an agent in Ukraine, Craig and other Skadden lawyers met with FARA's members in October 2013, while Craig "made false and misleading allegations," in particular that "his media contacts were extremely reactive and in order to correct misinformation." The letter he sent to PHARA officials in two days contained such claims.
In 2014, "confusing Craig," the indictment states that the unit quashed its decision, having determined that neither Scudden nor Craig should be registered as foreign agents.
The indictment states that Craig repeated the problematic statements in the office of a special lawyer during an interview in October 2017.
Craig's charges were expected within a few weeks, while Craig's own lawyers said they would expect such a result. It probably came back this year, after the Justice Department's National Security Department settled with Scudden in January over violations of the FARA in an agreement that allegedly accused of Craig.
The agreement forced the firm to reverse the 4.6 million dollars earned for its work in Ukraine and retroactively register as a foreign agent. The settlement language seems to fix almost all the blame on an unnamed partner who described Craig's statement, saying that he repeatedly gave "false and misleading" statements to officials of the Ministry of Justice.
Craig's research went on an unusual detour. After Mueller opened the initial investigation in Craig and Scudden, Craig's case was transferred to federal prosecutors in the Southern District of New York, and then again to prosecutors at the US Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia.
She was transferred from SDNY, because, after studying Craig's case, the federal prosecutors in New York came to the conclusion that they did not have enough evidence to accuse him, CNN reports.
rate in order to avoid charges against him, CNN reports.
They also expressed concern that Craig's political affiliation had made him a target and that he was being researched to offset the emphasis on investigating the Trump-related Republicans as a result of Muller's study.
Craig, who left Skalden at the beginning of 2018, is the second lawyer from the firm with whom the allegations are related to the report. Last year, Alex van der Zwahan found himself guilty of lying in the office of a special lawyer, admitting that he had mislead investigators about his discussions related to Scudden's work during the preparation of the report. carrying out operations of foreign influence. Last month, the head of the national security unit said he had appointed a prosecutor who worked at Muller's team in order to head an upgraded unit that would deal with unregistered foreign agents.