قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home https://server7.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/smyrwpoii/p2/ Feedback against the impossible and beyond the burgers that go mostly

Feedback against the impossible and beyond the burgers that go mostly

When the impossible burger was quietly launched in upscale restaurants a few years ago, the coverage was overwhelmingly positive, with some reviewers even calling it a future meal.

Qdoba, Burger King and supermarkets are now impossible goods. Another plant based company, Beyond Meat, is represented in Charles Jr., Metro, and now McDonald's. This is a sign that a new wave of meat is approaching its mainstream status – encouraging development if you are looking for a change in our meat-oriented food system .

But if the advent of meatballing a few years ago was unanimously accepted as a good thing, the reaction to its mainstream was riddled with skepticism. Eating fast-food and non-meat fast-food chains is definitely not welcome in some areas, even among those who you think may be more conducive to the event.

Call it a reaction against the rapid growth of lean meat.

For example, Whole Foods CEO and Chipotle CEO announced that they would hand over Beyond and Impossible products, noting that was over-processed. Food writer and former New York Times columnist Mark Bitman, who has long urged Americans to eat less meat, criticized "the new vegan meat for vegans" for not addressing to "resource utilization and hyper-processing" (though he welcomed them in the past). His website, Roasted also gave plant-based meat a favorable light, but recently wrote with nostalgia that "not long ago … Vegetarian burgers were not disguised as something they were not. ". In the meantime, numerous articles have questioned the impact of products on health.

Certainly, new vegetable-based burgers have also received a lot of positive coverage – and some pragmatic reviews are more focused on describing their taste (quite clear, though some reviewers insist that they may still note the difference) . But this is an emerging industry, and any rollback can have an impact.

There is certainly some truth in the criticism. "Behind and Impossible" burgers are not useful foods (I wrote about earlier), though they are no more useful for food than the lean foods they supplant. Impossible Whopper can help save the planet, but it will not save you from all the usual problems with the existence of hamburgers.

But critics go beyond simply observing that fast food is not healthy food. Often, critics have a disdain for the whole food production process at scale, as it must be produced to feed hundreds of millions of people. Thus, as Alex Trembat of the Breakthrough Institute has argued, a plant-based response reflects how much classicism and elitism get into our national conversations about our food system – and how they can stand in the way of fixing it.

Vegetable based meat can be great for the world. It can end factory farming, be more resilient, address global warming, and offer a way to feed the growing middle class with our favorite foods without destroying the planet along the way. As it matures as an industry, its offerings can also become cheaper, healthier, and more diverse.

But for plant-based food to change the world it is necessary to produce huge quantities of it and sell it where consumers want to buy it. And this, in turn, requires confronting the reality that consumers enjoy fast food, and that they have real value in providing them with fast food that is better for the world. When you look at it closely, the plant-based meat response is generally against our food system – wrongly aimed at one of the more promising efforts to make it a little better.

based on the mysterious myths debunked

There has been much criticism regarding plant foods. They all boil down to four broad observations: 1) they are highly processed; 2) they contain GMOs; 3) they are not as healthy or even dangerous to your health. and 4) they aesthetically deny it as "counterfeit" food.

Vegetable-based hamburgers are claimed by many critics to be "ultra-processed unhealthy foods." Whole Foods CEO John McKee warned customers that "they are super, highly processed products." Chipotle CEO Brian Nicole said: "We talked to those people, and unfortunately it does not fit into our principles of 'eating with integrity' through processing."

What is meant by "remade"? There is no perfect consistent meaning for processed foods, but the term can refer to any modified food – to preserve, enhance its taste, add nutrients or to obtain vegetable proteins to taste like a hamburger.

Safe burger and Impossible burger are certainly produced in a factory with many different herbal ingredients. But this word – "processed" – may eclipse more than it understands.

"There is now a really confusing nomenclature. The idea is that we can classify food as good or bad based on its degree of processing," said Ruth MacDonald, a nutrition scientist at Iowa State University. "And it doesn't make sense from a nutritional point of view, and it doesn't make sense from a food science standpoint either."

Pasteurization is a form of processing. Adding extra life-saving vitamins is a form of treatment. Yogurt is a highly processed food. Although processing may make food unhealthy, not all processed foods are unhealthy. You need to look at the ingredients and what processes, in particular, the food went through.

In terms of ingredients, the dozens listed in the Behind and the Impossible hamburgers are often cited as evidence that foods cannot be healthy. But even salad can have many ingredients, and ingredient lists on products are often more a product of labeling laws than an objective measure of how much goes into food.

This item elegantly made Rachel an impossible food item. Conrad:

If we had to list the beef ingredients the way we list the beef alternatives, it wouldn't look so good. Extracting is not that beef is bad for you (scientists are still fighting for it), but counting ingredients is not a way to find the answer.

Another common problem is the specter of GMOs. The Anti-GMO Food Safety Center has campaigned against the Impossible Burger and many activists in the anti-GMO community have joined.

More burger, to be clear, does not contain GMOs. Impossible Burger uses modified soybeans and a special ingredient derived from a genetically modified plant: the "heme" that makes burgers "bleed" comes from soybean roots, but Impossible Foods produces it from the yeast to get the right amount. This was eliminated by the FDA.

Impossible Foods team explains its decision to use modified soybeans rather than imports of GMO-free soybeans, pointing to environmental impact: GM soybean grown soybeans in the US, while GMO-free soybeans would require imports carbon Brazil.

Moreover, there is no good evidence that GMOs are a health hazard. Billions of people around the world have been eating genetically modified crops for decades until the harmful effects have been identified. Thousands of years ago, people genetically modified crops through a slower selection process for their pets. Some plants found in nature are unhealthy or even deadly; some GMOs have denser nutrients, require less pesticides, or are better for us otherwise. But most are just neutral. After extensive testing, the FDA agreed that the "Impossible Food" gem was normal.

The fact that new plant-based burgers are so processed and suspected of containing GMOs leads directly to a major criticism: they are not as healthy. And of course, one should not be mistaken for eating an unfeasible salad chewing burger. Vegetable-based meat doesn't work that way.

But the nutritionists who did the analysis largely found that meat burgers are good – no better for you than a beef burger, but no worse, with specific details depending on what priorities are in your health. there are. (Impossible Burger has more sodium than a beef burger, but beef burgers are usually salted during cooking; an impossible burger has less fat and a little less calories, but if you have it covered with mayonnaise on the cake, you'll add that fat and those calories straight back.]

"If you want nutritious, healthy food, you can and should eat vegetables and whole grains and fruits and all the other things that everyone knows they should eat," Ryan Mendelbaum wrote in a Gizmodo Controversy plant-based adulteration.

More severely accused is that these products are actively hazardous to your health. For example, in a May press release from the law firm Moms Across America, they claimed that Impossible Burgers tested positive for a herbicide called glyphosate. noted that the "positive test" found indicators "nearly 1000 times lower than the significant risk of glyphosate (1100 mcg per day) set by California Prop. 65". And California is setting some of the harshest guidelines in the world; guidelines from the World Health Organization and the EPA indicate that even higher daily rates are safe.

It is important that the environmental benefits of "Beyond and Impossible Burgers" remain under the barrage of new testing. Vegetable-based meat really emits far less CO2 and other greenhouse gases than meat, use less water and use less land. The thing is, a lot of people want, well, a burger. So why not offer them an environmentally friendly, animal friendly burger that can solve huge problems with our food system?

Forgery of counterfeit meat

Another component of backlash is not the health of everyone. Instead, it is a vague understanding that there is something noble in the food of dead animals that is simply absent when eats plant-based, factory-made inventions.

In a heated work, Daniel Laris tells the story of how her congregation gathered to slaughter a pig: "With every animal sent, every harvest," she writes, "I realized that our time was on land is temporary, and everything on it is a gift. I could plant seeds or grow animals, care for them, feed them, and then later I would depend on them to feed and support me. " Without meat, she writes, "these foods will never be able to follow the humiliating closeness to food where the animal's death is deeply felt."

But not the way most Americans eat meat . More than 99 percent of the meat produced for consumption in the United States comes from farmed animals where they often never see daylight and have little room for rotation. Most pigs are not shot at the end of a long life by a happy collection of neighbors, but are killed on a conveyor belt that can kill hundreds of pigs in a minute. (And the situation is about to get worse for pigs.)

Our food system is not natural. It wasn't naturally very long ago. The criticism that plant-based meat does not contribute to the joy, gratitude, and commitment of growing your own pig and then slaughtering it with neighbors is not wrong, but they have very little to say to the typical American [19659046] When a Niche Turns Mainstream

Impossible Burger started out as a niche product in upscale restaurants. The coverage was almost entirely positive: commentators welcomed that Michelin-starred restaurant in Manhattan added it to the menu. When it came to Silicon Valley, local newspapers were eager to announce that it would be served in Palo Alto "with sun-dried tomatoes, cavallo-nero (or lacinate cabbage) and dried mayonnaise with poppy bun" [19659049] ] now impossible burger is in Burger King. And it's much less appealing to his previous boosters.

According to Trembat's Breakthrough Institute, the integration of meat was coincidental when the food world turned on the burger. The food critics who have now praised it have lamented it .

"I can't help but notice," Trembat wrote in an analysis of a plant-based clear reaction – that when fake meat was the brainchild of food utopians and insightful chefs, thought leaders enthusiastically spoke out for it. But as soon as the fake meat got into the plastic trays at Burger King, they thought about how much it had been recycled. "

Isn't it possible to have the burger over processed? Hardly. If anything, it looks better now that Impossible Foods has affixed the FDA approval mark to the signature ingredient, gem.

But what was made into the burger was massive. From one restaurant in 2016, Impossible Burger is now available in more than 10,000 locations around the world.

Food historian Rachel Laudan states : "Ultra-processed easily means" industrially processed, "" low-class, "or "not to my liking". Soft drinks are ultra-processed, no wine. Snack cakes are ultra processed, homemade pies – no. "And Impossible Burger has not for some time been considered ultra-processed, enjoying, one might say," exceptional wine. "

With our food system, and nothing bad is said in it. But to confront all mass markets, mass-produced products are elitist and classic –

The three biggest damage caused by our current food system is environmental, public health, antibiotic resistance, and animals through farming. to solve all this, the alternatives to meat must be mass-produced on a plant or laboratory basis, and if we are unpleasant with the fact of mass production, then we cannot correct any of the problems that it currently causes.

Future Perfect. Twice a week, you get a list of ideas and solutions to solve our biggest problems: improving the health of the population, reducing the suffering of humans and animals, reducing catastrophic risks, and, simply put, doing better.

Source link